You have invested in Contentful. An independent review of your content model, your architecture and your entitlements.
for the Health Check. The Health Check & Roadmap is €9,900.
from kickoff to presentation.
Book a 30-minute call. Tell us roughly how many content types you have, which tier you are on, and which question is the one keeping you up. We will tell you which package fits - and if we think you need neither, we will tell you that instead.
per interviewee. Typically 3-5 people across editorial, marketing and IT.
Every content type in your space, mapped: live, orphaned, duplicated - with a proposed target model.
A report that is written in two layers - a management layer your board reads in ten minutes, and a technical annex your developers and your implementation partner can argue with.
Six dimensions, each scored with the evidence behind it. One page that tells you where you stand, with every score traceable to a specific finding.
The heart of it. Every content type mapped - what is live, what is orphaned, what duplicates something else, where reference chains run too deep. With a proposed target model and the path to it.
Your consumption against your tier - API calls, records, users, locales, environments - with headroom, overage exposure and an honest view on tier fit. A realistic annual saving as a figure, not a percentage.
Quick wins you can start without us, structural items that need a project, and the things that genuinely do not matter. Sorted by impact and effort.
Stay and remodel - rebuilt properly, in place. Evolve - re-architect spaces, environments and delivery. Move - what migration would genuinely cost. Each with a budget estimate and an honest recommendation.
Not a generic CMS audit with your platform's name on the cover. Every dimension is scored against how Contentful is actually built, priced and used.
Will this model still work when your content doubles? Content type inventory - live, orphaned, duplicated. Reference depth and circularity. Field-level bloat. Whether components are genuinely reusable. Above all: whether a monolithic page tree has been reproduced inside a headless system.
Is your setup designed, or did it accumulate? Single versus multi-space and whether that choice still fits. Environment strategy and aliases, whether model changes are scripted and versioned or applied by hand, locale architecture and fallbacks.
Does your data flow safely, or is your website hostage to another system? Webhook architecture and error handling, synchronisation from CRM, ERP, PIM and commerce, and coupling risk - whether a slow source system can degrade your site.
How long from an editor pressing publish to it being live? Frontend architecture and rendering strategy, CDA versus GraphQL usage and query efficiency, caching and CDN, preview infrastructure, build and revalidation times, Core Web Vitals.
Can your team actually work in this? Roles and permissions against how people really work. Whether workflows, tasks and scheduled publishing are used or ignored. Which Marketplace apps and UI extensions are installed and maintained - and what marketing has quietly started building outside the platform.
Are you on the right tier - and is Contentful still the right centre of your stack? Consumption against entitlement across API calls, records, users, locales and environments. Headroom, overage exposure, tier fit. (Roadmap tier) Your next three years against realistic alternatives, including doing nothing.
Common questions from digital and IT leaders running Contentful.
If any of these is a conversation you have had internally in the last six months, you are in the right place.
Contentful has no native sitemap view, so editors on large sites have no visual overview of their own content structure. We hit that on client projects and built Arboretum - a popular Contentful app that puts a full visual page hierarchy inside the Contentful UI, with an open-source SDK. It is now used by major Contentful partners and Contentful showcase clients, including agencies we compete with.
When other implementation teams reach for your tooling to solve their own problem, that is a harder credential to acquire than a badge - and a more relevant one when the question is do these people actually understand this platform.
One of the most complex Contentful platforms in production, and one that a small team runs daily without a developer.
The question about your existing partner is delicate, and we handle it in a particular way. We assess the work, not the agency. We measure your content model against documented Contentful practice and against what we would expect from an instance of its age and scale, then show you the evidence and the reasoning.
You draw the conclusion - we do not deliver a verdict on another firm. We also implement Contentful, so you should know our interest. That is exactly why the finding is evidence-based rather than an opinion: an opinion from us here would be worth nothing, and we know it.
If your current partner wants to respond to the technical annex, we think that is a good outcome - and we are happy to be in that conversation.
Fixed price, fixed timebox, fixed deliverables. The scope is agreed at kickoff and does not move.
Answers: where do we stand, are we getting our money's worth, can this cost less. 1-2 weeks, one to two interview sessions, hands-on review of your spaces, model, environments and locales, all six dimensions scored, the content model report, the entitlement and cost picture, and a 90-minute presentation.
Answers: all five, including the partner question and stay-or-go. 2 weeks, everything above plus a proposed target content model with a costed migration path, a frontend and integration code review, three costed paths, a half-day options workshop and a decision paper for your board.
Bright Global's Terms and Conditions apply. This page is a non-binding offer, not a contract. Prices exclude VAT and are valid until 31 December 2026 — contact us for a binding offer.
